Clinicians' judgments of clinical utility: a comparison of the DSM-IV with dimensional models of general personality.

  • Professor
  • Clinical
  • Psychology
012-H Kastle Hall
859.257.6849
TitleClinicians' judgments of clinical utility: a comparison of the DSM-IV with dimensional models of general personality.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2009
JournalJournal of personality disorders
Volume23
Issue3
Pagination211-29
ISSN0885-579X
Abstract

Clinical utility, or the usefulness of a diagnostic system in clinical practice, has been identified as a potential limitation of alternative dimensional models of personality disorder, such as the five-factor model (FFM; McCrae & Costa, 1990), the Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI; Cloninger, 2000), the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire (MPQ; Tellegen & Waller, 1987), and the Shedler & Westen Assessment Procedure-200 (SWAP-200; Shedler & Westen, 1998). Both proponents of and opponents to dimensional models of personality disorder have suggested that their clinical utility be assessed in preparation for DSM-V (e.g., Rounsaville et al., 2002; First et al., 2002; Verheul, 2005; First, 2005). Samuel & Widiger (2006) found the FFM to have significantly greater clinical utility than the existing diagnostic categories. In the current study, 1,572 practicing psychologists were asked to describe one of three cases using the DSM-IV and the constructs of one of four alternative dimensional models (FFM, TCI, MPQ, SWAP). Clinicians then rated each model on six aspects of clinical utility. Results indicate that clinicians find dimensional models to be higher in clinical utility than the DSM-IV on five of the six aspects of clinical utility, but not significantly different from each other. Implications of these findings are discussed.

URLhttp://guilfordjournals.com/doi/abs/10.1521/pedi.2009.23.3.211
DOI10.1521/pedi.2009.23.3.211
Short TitleJ Pers Disord
X
Enter your linkblue username.
Enter your linkblue password.
Secure Login

This login is SSL protected

Loading